Analisis soal esai materi bioteknologi berdasarkan literasi biologi pada buku teks dan buku sekolah elektronik biologi SMA

Shofwatun Nada; Nurhofifah Dian; Yunita Yunita

doi:10.37301/esabi.v8i1.98

Authors

Shofwatun Nada Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kudus
Nurhofifah Dian Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati
Yunita Yunita Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37301/esabi.v8i1.98

Keywords:

Aspek literasi biologi, Bioteknologi, Buku sekolah elektronik, Buku teks, Soal esai

Abstract

Buku Sekolah Elektronik (BSE) dan buku teks cetak berfungsi sebagai instrumen utama dalam proses pembelajaran biologi, termasuk sebagai acuan penyusunan alat evaluasi berupa soal esai. Materi bioteknologi menjadi fokus krusial dalam kurikulum karena keterkaitannya yang erat dengan perkembangan sains serta teknologi global. Penelitian deskriptif kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis muatan aspek literasi biologi pada soal esai materi bioteknologi dalam enam buku teks kelas XII SMA. Sampel penelitian terdiri atas tiga buku teks komersial (A, B, C) dan tiga BSE (D, E, F) terbitan Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa soal esai pada keenam buku tersebut merepresentasikan lima aspek literasi biologi, meliputi K1, K3, K4, K5, dan K6. Buku BSE E dan Buku Teks A mencatatkan persentase tertinggi (83,33%) dengan sebaran jumlah soal paling dominan, mengindikasikan kualitas instrumen evaluasi yang lebih komprehensif. Sebaliknya, Buku Teks B, C, serta BSE D dan F memiliki persentase yang sama (50%) dengan kuantitas soal yang terbatas, sehingga dikategorikan cukup baik. Temuan ini mengindikasikan perlunya peningkatan variasi serta kedalaman muatan aspek literasi biologi pada instrumen esai guna menstimulasi kompetensi abad ke-21 peserta didik secara optimal.

Author Biographies

Shofwatun Nada, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kudus

Tadris Biologi

Nurhofifah Dian, Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati

Tadris Biologi

Yunita Yunita, Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati

Tadris Biologi

References

Ardianto, D., & Rubini, B. (2016). Comparison of students’ scientific literacy in integrated science learning through model of guided discovery and problem-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 31-37.

Ates, S., & Eryilmaz, A. (2016). The effectiveness of simulations in science education: A review. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 48–59.

Berk, R. A. (2016). Top 10 flashpoints in student ratings and the evaluation of teaching: What faculty and administrators must know to protect themselves in employment decisions. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Buller, J. L. (2015). Best practices in faculty evaluation: A practical guide for academic leaders. John Wiley & Sons.

Burgess, C. (2019). Beyond cultural competence: Transforming teacher professional learning through Aboriginal community-controlled cultural immersion. Critical Studies in Education, 60(4), 477-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1306576

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35.

Choi, B. C., & Pak, A. W. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351–364.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: Pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.

Gilbert, J. K., & Justi, R. (2016). Modelling-based teaching in science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29039-3

Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098

Hamidah, N., Prabawati, S., Fajriati, I., & Eilks, I. (2017). Incorporating sustainability in higher chemistry education in Indonesia through green chemistry: Inspirations by inquiring the practice in a German university. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 9(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijpce/79220

Listyarini, R. V. (2019). Promoting sustainability in undergraduate program: Students’ perception in green chemistry course. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 3(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v3i1.1684

Listyarini, R. V., Pamenang, F. D. N. P., Harta, J., Wijayanti, L. W., Asy’ari, M., & Lee, W. (2019). The integration of green chemistry principles into small scale chemistry practicum for senior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 371-378. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19250

Misbah, M., Suyidno, S., & Susantini, E. (2016). Developing science literacy assessment instrument based on scientific approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 189–197.

Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pamenang, F. D. N., Harta, J., Listyarini, R. V., Wijayanti, L. W., Ratri, M. C., Hapsari, N. D., Asy’ari, M., & Lee, W. (2020). Developing chemical equilibrium practicum module based on guided inquiry to explore students’ abilities in designing experiments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470(1), 012097. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012097

Rosa, G. C., Cari, C., Aminah, N. S., & Handhika, J. (2018). Students’ understanding level and scientific literacy competencies related to momentum and impulse. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 012019. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012019

Rustaman, N. Y. (2005). Strategi belajar mengajar biologi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009

Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182

Sudijono, A. (2015). Pengantar statistik pendidikan. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2018). Contextual learning to improve science process skills and scientific attitudes through science literacy. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 57–68.

Tan, O. S. (2003). Problem-based learning innovation. Thomson.